<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>dbFront.com - Recent questions in Security</title>
<link>https://dbfront.com/qa/questions/security</link>
<description>Powered by Question2Answer</description>
<item>
<title>Active Directory Federated Services Single Sign-on Setup</title>
<link>https://dbfront.com/qa/1342/active-directory-federated-services-single-sign-on-setup</link>
<description>&lt;p&gt;Does dbFront support Active Directory Federated Services?&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
<category>Security</category>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://dbfront.com/qa/1342/active-directory-federated-services-single-sign-on-setup</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 08 Sep 2023 17:39:06 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Admin Grants Access to a Connection</title>
<link>https://dbfront.com/qa/1302/admin-grants-access-to-a-connection</link>
<description>&lt;p&gt;Would it be possible to describe option &quot;&lt;strong&gt;1) Admin Grants Access to a Connection&lt;/strong&gt;&quot; in more details? If possible with screenshots.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I cannot create non administrative users.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
<category>Security</category>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://dbfront.com/qa/1302/admin-grants-access-to-a-connection</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 Mar 2023 15:59:33 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>SSL Certificate - Could we use a wildcard certificate</title>
<link>https://dbfront.com/qa/1211/ssl-certificate-could-we-use-a-wildcard-certificate</link>
<description>&lt;p&gt;We are updating our public SSL certificate and would like to utilize a wildcard certificate instead. Does the application support that?&lt;br&gt;
At the moment - we are getting a error, but we can see that it is using the new wildcard certificate.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
<category>Security</category>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://dbfront.com/qa/1211/ssl-certificate-could-we-use-a-wildcard-certificate</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 02 Jul 2022 14:26:53 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Can't save Settings.  Access to the path ... is denied.</title>
<link>https://dbfront.com/qa/1125/cant-save-settings-access-to-the-path-is-denied</link>
<description>&lt;p&gt;We have a Windows 2019 server and our environment is high security.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;We used to be able to save the settings in dbFront but now we get the error message:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Can't process [SaveSetup], Access to the path 'C:\Program Files (x86)\dbFront\51nzdt4a.tmp' is denied.&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;What has changed?&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
<category>Security</category>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://dbfront.com/qa/1125/cant-save-settings-access-to-the-path-is-denied</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 26 Jan 2022 22:34:54 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>dbFront is NOT affected by the Log4j Security Vulnerability</title>
<link>https://dbfront.com/qa/1107/dbfront-is-not-affected-by-the-log4j-security-vulnerability</link>
<description>&lt;p&gt;We are reaching out to all our software vendors. Can you please let us know if this security vulnerability affects your software?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a rel=&quot;nofollow&quot; href=&quot;https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-44228&quot;&gt;https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-44228&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
<category>Security</category>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://dbfront.com/qa/1107/dbfront-is-not-affected-by-the-log4j-security-vulnerability</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 11 Dec 2021 20:02:43 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Warning: The User List Was Truncated!</title>
<link>https://dbfront.com/qa/912/warning-the-user-list-was-truncated</link>
<description>&lt;p&gt;When opening or refreshing the &quot;Connection Access&quot; dialog I see the message.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;THE USER LIST WAS TRUNCATED!&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br&gt;
A user list of 127201 users and 55 groups was loaded.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;What is the cause and what can be done about this.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
<category>Security</category>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://dbfront.com/qa/912/warning-the-user-list-was-truncated</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2021 18:55:50 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Row Level Security examples including CASE and IF</title>
<link>https://dbfront.com/qa/775/row-level-security-examples-including-case-and-if</link>
<description>&lt;p&gt;We are currently testing this functionality. What would be helpful is some more examples that show what can be included in the row level security in terms of SQL language. I.e. can we include 'case' or 'if when' clauses to distinguish between users? &lt;/p&gt;
</description>
<category>Security</category>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://dbfront.com/qa/775/row-level-security-examples-including-case-and-if</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 12 Aug 2020 14:59:26 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Filter recordset by user access with where clause</title>
<link>https://dbfront.com/qa/772/filter-recordset-by-user-access-with-where-clause</link>
<description>&lt;p&gt;Is it possible to provide a user with an already filtered recordset or table? Example - we have one large table that contains records for a number of technicians. When a technician logs in he should only see the records that are related to him. He should not have access to any other records. There is a field in this table that contains his name. &lt;/p&gt;
</description>
<category>Security</category>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://dbfront.com/qa/772/filter-recordset-by-user-access-with-where-clause</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 12 Aug 2020 13:16:43 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Single-Sign-On Extent?</title>
<link>https://dbfront.com/qa/668/single-sign-on-extent</link>
<description>&lt;p&gt;When you say &quot;Enabling Single-Sign-On will disable Windows and Database authentication&quot;, is that just in reference to logging in?  Can you still use Windows or Database authentication in setting up database connections?&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
<category>Security</category>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://dbfront.com/qa/668/single-sign-on-extent</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2020 14:46:42 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Error: &quot;No Database connection access&quot;, How to login without Admin access?</title>
<link>https://dbfront.com/qa/146/error-database-connection-access-login-without-admin-access</link>
<description>&lt;p&gt;I can't connect to a database using a non-administrative user.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I get the error message:  &quot;No Database connection access&quot;.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
<category>Security</category>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://dbfront.com/qa/146/error-database-connection-access-login-without-admin-access</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 01 Jun 2018 14:04:52 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Can't get SID for 'groupname', The Server service is not started.</title>
<link>https://dbfront.com/qa/128/cant-get-sid-for-groupname-the-server-service-is-not-started</link>
<description>&lt;p&gt;The following errors appears in dbFront after a server restart or a dbFrontService restart..&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;Can't get SID for '%groupname%', The Server service is not started.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/blockquote&gt;
</description>
<category>Security</category>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://dbfront.com/qa/128/cant-get-sid-for-groupname-the-server-service-is-not-started</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 13 Feb 2018 19:15:17 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>AD Groups Support</title>
<link>https://dbfront.com/qa/88/ad-groups-support</link>
<description>&lt;p&gt;Is there now or planned support for AD Groups instead of individual users? It'd be nice if I could make an AD group &quot;DBFront-Update&quot; and put all the users in AD in that group and then add that group to dbFront for access.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
<category>Security</category>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://dbfront.com/qa/88/ad-groups-support</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 04 Oct 2017 02:09:10 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>AD performance issues when using the &quot;access&quot; button (limit OU selection)</title>
<link>https://dbfront.com/qa/77/performance-issues-when-using-access-button-limit-selection</link>
<description>&lt;p&gt;When using the Connection Access button the number of entries returned causes major lag.  Is there a way to limit the OU selection within DBFront. (i.e. OU=ThisOU,CN=Company,DC=com)?&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
<category>Security</category>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://dbfront.com/qa/77/performance-issues-when-using-access-button-limit-selection</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 20 Jul 2017 02:46:40 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>